Print this page | ||
Graham on behalf of the Ngadju People (Ngadju Part B) v State of Western Australia [2017] FCA 795 | ||
Binomial Name: | Federal Court of Australia | |
Date: | 17 July 2017 | |
Sub Category: | Consent Determination (Native Title Act) | |
Place: | Area encompassing parts of Widgiemooltha, Higginsville & Carnilya Hill. | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
State/Country: | Western Australia, Australia | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
Located within the City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder, Shire of Coolgardie and Shire of Dundas. The land is situated approx. half way between Kalgoorlie and Norseman in Western Australia. See the below attachment for more details. | ||
Legal Status: | Registered on the National Native Title Register | |
Legal Reference: | Federal Court No: WAD6020/1998; National Native Title Tribunal No: WCD2017/002 | |
Alternative Names: | ||
Subject Matter: | Native Title | |
URL: | http://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FCA/2017/795.html | |
Summary Information: | ||
Between John Walter Graham, Betty Bulleen, AD (Dec), Ollan Dimer (Dec), Sonny Graham, Katie Ray, Georgina Schultz, Jack Schultz, Mabel Wilson and Maureen Young on behalf of the Ngadju people (Applicants); and the State of Western Australia, City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder, Shire of Coolgardie, Goldfields Land & Sea Council Aboriginal Corporation, BHP Billiton Nickel West Pty Ltd, St Ives Gold Mining Company Pty Limited, Arubiddy Pastoral Co Pty Ltd, Childara Pty Ltd, Commonwealth Hill Pty Ltd, Jarac Pty Ltd, Jemarkin Nominees Pty Ltd, Mileura Cattle Co Pty Ltd, Norgate Nominees Pty Ltd, Sydney Ernest Pond, Red Sun Nominees Pty Ltd, Christopher Ryan South, Monica Margaret South, and Vanesk Pty Ltd (Respondents). Judge Griffiths J Determination Native title exists in all the determination area. Native title is held by the Ngadju People. The exclusive native title rights over the 'exclusive' determination area are:
These exclusive rights become 'non-exclusive' when in the non-exclusive areas. The Non-exclusive native title rights over the 'non-exclusive' determination area are:
See maps of the 'non-exclusive' areas in Schedule 3 attached below. Non-native title rights and interests that exist within the determination area:
Non-exclusive native title rights and interests will prevail over the non-exclusive native title. Ngadju Native Title Aboriginal Corporation (ICN 8297), as the prescribed body corporate, is to perform functions required under the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) and to act as agent for the native title holders. The native title is not held in trust for the native title holders. Areas of Exclusive and Non-exclusive Native Title Rights: The native title rights of Exclusive Native Title Rights: Native title rights are exclusive within the "Exclusive area". This area is described in item 1.2 of Schedule 1 of the determination as comprising all the areas listed in Schedule 4, excluding all land and waters below the high watermark of the foreshore of the coastline including rivers, streams and estuaries that are affected by the ebb and flow of the tides. It is shaded pink on the map in Schedule 3 (see in documents below). Non-exclusive Native Title Rights: The "Non-exclusive area" means those parts of the determination area which are not in the unclaimed area or the exclusive area. This area is identified and shaded orange in the maps in Schedule 3 (see in documents below). | ||
Detailed Information: | ||
Background: This determination is a combination of two other native title claims that were made on behalf of the Ngadju People, and which have been heard by the court since 1995. Approx. 4 percent of the Ngadju application area was overlapped by two other native title claims from the Kalamaia Kabu(d)n People (WAD6216/1998) and Widji People (WAD6243/1998). In December 2011, the court made orders that the part of the Ngadju application area that didn't overlap with the two other claims would be referred to as the "Ngadju Trial Area proceeding". That hearing resulted in the making of the Ngadju Part A Determination in April 2016. This current proceeding (Ngadju Part B Determination) covers the area that was not included in the previous Part A Determination. Details of Judgement: The signed agreement was filed in the Federal Court pursuant to s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth). The court was satisfied that a determination of native title was within the power of the court. The court made orders by consent which recognise that the Ngadju people have, and always have had, native title rights and interests in the land within the determination area. | ||
Outcomes: | ||
Native title exists in the entire determination area |
| ||||
| ||||
|
Was this useful? Click here to fill in the ATNS survey