Print this page | ||
Malthouse on behalf of the Bar Barrum People #6 v State of Queensland (No 2) [2016] FCA 696 | ||
Binomial Name: | Federal Court of Australia | |
Date: | 10 June 2016 | |
Sub Category: | Consent Determination (Native Title Act) | |
Place: | Atherton Tableland, Northern Queensland Region | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
State/Country: | Queensland, Australia | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
The Determination Area covers land in and around Dimbulah, Herberton, Irvinebank, and Mount Garnett on the Atherton Tableland in North Queensland. The area is approximately 48.49 square kilometers, approximately 300km west of Cairns, and 285km north-west of the Tablelands in Far North Queensland. It includes areas of exclusive native title spanning approximately 39.88 square kilometers (combined), and areas of non-exclusive native title rights, spanning approximately 8.61 square kilometers (combined). | ||
Legal Status: | Registered on the National Native Title Register. | |
Legal Reference: | Federal Court No: QUD6032/2001; National Native Title Tribunal No: QCD2016/2010. | |
Subject Matter: | Native Title | |
URL: | http://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FCA/2016/696.html | |
Summary Information: | ||
Malthouse on behalf of the Bar Barrum People #6 v State of Queensland (No.2) [2016] FCA 696 Between: Layne Malthouse, Tennyson Kynuna, and Lynette Burke on behalf of the Bar Barrum People #6 (Applicants), and the State of Queensland, Mareeba Shire Council, Ergon Energy Corporation Limited, Telstra Corporation Limited, Jodie Bunney, and Lachlan Shaw (Respondents). Judge: Reeves J Determination: Native Title exists in all of the determination area. It consists of exclusive and non-exclusive native title rights. Where made: Queensland Determination: Native title exists in all of the determination area. It consists of exclusive and non-exclusive native title rights. Native Title is held by the Bar Barrum People. Exclusive native title rights over the determination area:
Non-exclusive native title rights and interests that exist in the determination area: In relation to water, the non-exclusive rights (within the exclusive area) for personal, domestic, and non-commercial communal purposes, include:
And in relation to the non-exclusive areas, as described in Part 2 of Schedule 1A of the determination, the non-exclusive rights exist to:
Non-native title rights and interests that exist within the determination area:
In case of conflict, the exercise of non-native title rights and interests will prevail over the non-exclusive native title. The Mbabaram Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC, as the prescribed body corporate, is to perform functions required under the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) and to act as agent for the Bar Barrum People. | ||
Detailed Information: | ||
Background: On 28 June 2001, Hely J made a determination of native title for the first application for determination of native title made on behalf of the Bar Barrum People (Bar Barrum People #1). In the fifteen years between 2001 and 2016, the Bar Barrum People filed and litigated eight other applications. This claim was filed, within a series of other claims by the Bar Barrum People, in 2003. Four of which (Bar Barrum People #2, #3, #4 and #6) were determined by the Federal Court on 10 June 2016 in Dimbulah, Queensland (Lyndham, 2016). In 2015, the consent determinations were delayed when the State of Queensland challenged the claim. The appeal was heard on the basis that during World War II the Commonwealth had taken possession of the land for military activities and as such any native title rights or interests had since been extinguished in the determination area. This High Court was split on the matter (Queensland v Congoo [2015] HCA 17). As such, the decision of the Federal Court was upheld, meaning the native title rights and interests of the Bar Barrum People were held to be valid [6]. Details of Judgment: Through case management conducted by the Deputy Registrar of the Federal Court, skilled legal representation, and a detailed set of submissions in support of the proposals made by the Bar Barrum Applicant, Reeves J was satisfied that agreement between the parties was free and informed [16]. The Court was satisfied that the determination of native title was within their power, and as such, the signed agreement was filed in the Federal Court pursuant to s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) [16]. | ||
Outcomes: | ||
Native Title exists in the entire determination area. |
| ||||
| ||||
|
Was this useful? Click here to fill in the ATNS survey