Print this page | ||
Jack on behalf of the Imarnte, Titjikala and Idracowra Estates v Northern Territory of Australia [2018] FCA 708 | ||
Binomial Name: | Federal Court of Australia | |
Date: | 23 May 2018 | |
Sub Category: | Consent Determination (Native Title Act) | |
Place: | Central Region of the Northern Territory | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
State/Country: | Northern Territory, Australia | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
The claim relates to approximately 3225 square kilometres of land in the Central Region of the Northern Territory. The area subject to the claim is the land and waters in NT Portions 810 and 1229 (part). For a detailed description and map of the area see Schedules A and B of the determination. Schedule B is attached below under documents. The area is within the jurisdiction of the Macdonnell Region Council. | ||
Legal Status: | Registered with the National Native Title Tribunal on the Native Title Register. | |
Legal Reference: | Federal Court file no.: DCD2018/001; National Native Title Tribunal file no.: NTD35/2015. | |
Alternative Names: | ||
Subject Matter: | Native Title | |
URL: | http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FCA/2018/708.html | |
Summary Information: | ||
Between: Desmond Jack, Reggie Kenny, Jeanette Ungwanaka, and Eric Braedon on behalf of the members of Imarnte, Titjikala and Idracowra Estates (Applicants) and Northern Territory of Australia; Helium Australia Pty Ltd ACN 078 104 006; and Santos QNT Pty Ltd (Respondents). Judge: Charlesworth J Determination Native title exists in parts of the determination area It consists of non-exclusive native title rights and interests. Native title holders The people who are members by descent or adoption of the five family groups are Braedon (Group 1), Taylor and Kenny (Group 2), Johnson (Group 3), Ungwanaka, Schilling, Campbell and Pepperill (Group 4), and Abbott, Armstrong and Corrigan (Group 5) with responsibility for the Imarnte, Titjikala and Idracowra Estates. Non-exclusive native title rights and interests over part of the determination area Apart from areas of public works, as described in Schedule C, these rights exist over the area described in Schedules A and B and include the rights to:
Other rights and interests in the determination area These other rights and interests exist over the area described in clause 9 of the determination and include those held by:
See clause 9 for further information about the non-native title rights and interests. In the case of conflict, the exercise of non-native title rights and interests will prevail over the non-exclusive native title The Rodinga Aboriginal Corporation Registered Native Title Body Corporate (RNTBC), is the prescribed body corporate. It performs the functions required under the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) and acts as agent for the Imarnte, Titjikala and Idracowra Estate Groups. Full text of the determination is available via the URL link above. | ||
Detailed Information: | ||
Background In 2015, the Applicant filed a claim for a native title determination by consent in relation to approximately 3225 square kilometres of land and waters in the Central Region of the Northern Territory of Australia. The applicant provided an anthropological report by Dr Morton who conducted field research in October 2014, October 2015 and March 2016 [17]. The parties reached agreement to recognise the claimants as native title holders over the Determination Area. The parties have also agreed to a list of commonly occurring Government public works within the Determination Area that wholly extinguish native title per Schedule C [19]. The parties filed their agreement with the Court. Details of Judgment Dr Morton's anthropological report examined the known lineage of claimants and confirmed their long-standing respective responsibilities in relation to the Imarnte, Titjikala and Idracowra estates within the Determination Area and addresses the requirement of s 225 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) [17]. Justice Charlesworth held that the report was a proper basis for the parties' consent to their filed agreement [18]. His Honour was satisfied that it was within the Court's power under s 87(1)(A) of the NTA to make a determination that was consistent with the terms of the party's written agreement [20]. | ||
Outcomes: | ||
Native title exists in parts of the determination area. |
| ||||
| ||||
|
Was this useful? Click here to fill in the ATNS survey