Print this page | ||
Coulthard v State of South Australia (Adnyamathanha, Ngadjuri and Wilyakali Overlap Claim) [2018] FCA 1993 | ||
Binomial Name: | Federal Court of Australia | |
Date: | 14 December 2018 | |
Sub Category: | Consent Determination (Native Title Act) | |
Place: | Greater South Australia | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
State/Country: | South Australia, Australia | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
The Determination Area is divided into three separate areas: the West area; the Central area; and the East area. For a detailed description of the area and maps see Schedule 1 of the determination, attached below under documents. The area is within the jurisdiction of the Flinders Ranges Council, the District Council of Orroroo/Carrieton and the District Council of Peterborough. | ||
Legal Status: | Registered with the National Native Title Tribunal on the Native Title Register 14/12/2018. | |
Legal Reference: | Federal Court file no(s).: SAD6001/1998; SAD147/2010; SAD417/2015; National Native Title Tribunal file no.: SCD2018/002 | |
Alternative Names: | ||
Subject Matter: | Native Title | |
URL: | http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FCA/2018/1993.html?context=1;query=Coulthard%20v%20State%20of%20South%20Australia;mask_path= | |
Summary Information: | ||
Between: Vincent Coulthard and others (First Applicant) and Vincent Branson and others (Second Applicant) and Beverley Bates and others (Third Applicant) and State of South Australia and others (Respondents) Judge: White J Determination Native title exists in parts of the determination area It consists of exclusive and/or non-exclusive native title rights and interests. Native title holders Adnyamathanha, Ngadjuri and Wilyakali Peoples. Exclusive native title rights and interests over part of the determination area This is the right to possession, occupation, use, and enjoyment of the area described in Schedule 1, to the exclusion of all others. Non-exclusive native title rights and interests over part of the determination area These rights exist over the area described in Schedule 2 and include the right to:
Other rights and interests in the determination area include:
See Schedule 7 and 8 for further information about the non-native title rights and interests. In the case of conflict, the exercise of non-native title rights and interests will prevail over the non-exclusive native title The Ngadjuri Adnyamathanha Wilyakali Native Title Aboriginal Corporation Registered Native Title Body Corporate (RNTBC) is the prescribed body corporate. It performs the functions required under the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) and acts as agent for the Adnyamathanha, Ngadjuri and Wilyakali Peoples. Full text of the determination is available via the URL link above. | ||
Detailed Information: | ||
Background The Adnyamathanha, Ngadjuri and Wilyakali Peoples lodged three separate applications for the determination of native title in respect of large areas of land in the east of South Australia. On 26 February 2018, the claims were combined into a single overlap proceeding by court order because the claims (in part) covered the same area. By combining the applications, the Court gave effect to s 67 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth). Native title rights and interests in the determination area were allocated as follows:
Lucy Kingston, on behalf of the South Australian Native Title Services wrote an article titled 'Three Aboriginal Nations Sharing Country'. The article praises the Adnyamathanha, Ngadjuri and Wilyakali Peoples for bringing a joint determination of their native title rights and interests. In addition, the article documents opinions and statements from some of the native title holders. According to Chairperson of the Ngadjuri Nation Aboriginal Corporation, Quentin Agius, the decision was 'a long time coming' as the process to achieve recognition begun 15 years ago (Kingston, SANTS). Mr Agius acknowledged that 'it's been a hard slog' for the three groups to bring a joint claim as 'sometimes you don't see eye to eye' (Kingston, SANTS). However, Mr Aguis emphasised that the outcome of the determination was a 'joyous' occasion (Kingston, SANTS). Wilyakali Elder and named applicant Maureen O'Donnell also recognised the difficulty associated with bringing a claim, stating that 'it brings to you again the things that were taken away many years ago'. Although Ms O'Donnell similarly highlighted that 'it means so much to be recognised by the white man's law,' to attain recognition for 'what we always knew was true' (Kingston, SANTS). Details of Judgment The parties reached agreement as to the terms of the determination of native title pursuant to s 87 of the Native Title Act. The court was satisfied that a determination of native title was within the power of the court. | ||
Outcomes: | ||
Native title exists in part of the determination area. |
| ||||
| ||||
|
Was this useful? Click here to fill in the ATNS survey