Print this page | ||
Eaton on behalf of the Nyamal People #10 v State of Western Australia [2019] FCA 1571 | ||
Binomial Name: | Federal Court of Australia | |
Date: | 24 September 2019 | |
Sub Category: | Consent Determination (Native Title Act) | |
Place: | Shire of East Pilbara, Town of Port Hedland | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
State/Country: | Western Australia, Australia | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
The area comprises 4,394 square kilometres of land and waters situated approximately 30 kilometres east of Port Hedland in the Central Pilbara region in the north of Western Australia. For a detailed description of the area and maps see Schedules One and Two of the determination, attached below under documents. The area is within the jurisdiction of the Shire of East Pilbara. | ||
Legal Status: | Registered with the National Native Title Tribunal on the Native Title Register 03/06/1999. | |
Legal Reference: | Federal Court file no.: WAD26/2019 ; National Native Title Tribunal file no.: WCD2019/011 | |
Alternative Names: | ||
Subject Matter: | Native Title | |
URL: | http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FCA/2019/1571.html?context=1;query=Eaton%20on%20behalf%20of%20the%20Nyamal%20People%20#10;mask_path= | |
Summary Information: | ||
Between: Doris Eaton, Alice Mitchell and Doris Monaghan on Behalf of the Nyamal People (Applicant) and State of Western Australia, Coongan Aboriginal Corporation, Strelley Pastoral Pty Ltd, The Nomads Charitable and Educational Foundation Inc and Yamatji Marlpa Aboriginal Corporation (Respondents) Judge: Justice Reeves Determination Native title exists in parts of the determination area It consists of exclusive and non-exclusive native title rights and interests. Native title holders Native title is held by the Nyamal People, as defined in Schedule Seven. Exclusive native title rights and interests over part of the determination area This is the right to possession, occupation, use, and enjoyment, to the exclusion of all others, of all the parts of the area described in Schedule Three, except in relation to flowing and underground water. The exclusive area is shaded green on the maps in Schedule Two. In relation to flowing and underground water in this area of exclusive native title, the Nyamal People have rights to enjoy and use the resources, including:
Non-exclusive native title rights and interests over part of the determination area These rights exist over the non-exclusive area shaded yellow on the maps at Schedule Two. In the judgment, this area is described those parts of the determination area that are not exclusive areas, or those described in paragraph 2 of the judgment as an area where native title does not exist. The non-exclusive rights include:
Other rights and interests in the determination area include:
See Schedule Six for further information about the non-native title rights and interests. In the case of conflict, the exercise of non-native title rights and interests will prevail over the non-exclusive native title The Nyamal Aboriginal Corporation Registered Native Title Body Corporate (RNTBC) is the prescribed body corporate. It performs the functions required under the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) and holds the native title in trust for the Nyamal People. Full text of the determination is available via the URL link above. | ||
Detailed Information: | ||
Background Originally, this application was filed on 25 May 2000 [4]. At this time, the Nyamal #10 Application overlapped with two other native title applications: the Warren (WAD 82 of 1998) and the Ngarla #2 (WAD 77 of 2005) applications [5]. On 27 March 2007, Justice Bennett ordered that the extent of the overlap with the Ngarla #2 Application be dealt with in the Ngarla #2 proceeding [7]. On 20 August 2010, the Nyamal #10 Application was amended to decrease the area of the claim and it no longer overlapped with the Ngarla proceeding [10]. Due to the resolution of other native title applications, by 3 October 2014 the Nyamal #10 Application no longer overlapped any other native title application [13]. The parties to the Nyamal #10 Application came to an agreement in early 2019 and Justice Reeves approved the agreement per s 87 of the Native Title Act [15]. On learning of the successful native title determination, Ms Eaton stated that "I'm happy and I'm sad. Sad that we lost our old people [and they're] not with us... [but] it's a happy time, at least we got a right to negotiate with Government... give us [the] right for our voice to be raised through the Government system... so our next generation can plan things better. But for myself, I am happy... I'm over the moon we are getting determination. It's a good thing." (Cross, 2019) Details of Judgment On the parties' persistence with the native title process, Justice Reeves stated that "one of the objects of the NTA is to resolve native title claims by negotiation and agreement. The negotiations and agreement that have led to this determination of native title clearly serve to advance that object. The parties are to be congratulated for the years of effort and persistence that have been required to pursue the negotiations to their finality" [35]-[36]. Importantly, Justice Reeves made clear the role of a native title determination, and in doing so recognised the longevity of Indigenous Law in Australia; "In conclusion, it is worth making this observation: this determination of native title does not create native title in the determination area. Instead, it marks the recognition, by the Australian legal system, of the Nyamal people's long held, and pre-existing, native title in this land. That is to say, that native title has existed in this land, according to the traditional laws and customs of the Nyamal People, since long before this determination today" [38]. |
| ||||
| ||||
|
Was this useful? Click here to fill in the ATNS survey