Print this page | ||
Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) decision on the Native Title Amendment Act 1998 (Cth) decision | ||
Category: | Case Law | |
Date: | 18 March 1999 | |
Place: | Geneva | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
State/Country: | Switzerland | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
Subject Matter: | Law - Policy and Justice | Native Title | |
Summary Information: | ||
The role of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination CERD CERD is a body of independent experts that monitors State parties' implementation of The CERD decision on the 1998 Amendments to the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (NTA) On 18 March 1999, CERD handed down its decision in relation to the 1998 amendments to the NTA. CERD found that the amendments were inconsistent with Australia's obligations under the
CERD urged Australia to suspend the
(Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner, HEROC. Report No. 1/2000)
| ||
Detailed Information: | ||
Background On 11 August 1998, CERD issued an early warning and urgent action in relation to an information request about the 1998 amendments to the NTA. On 5 June 1999, CERD wrote to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner at the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC) requesting information for consideration at the CERD 55th session. Australian government representatives appeared before CERD in Geneva on 12 and 15 March 1999 in relation to the early warning and the request. Before handing down its official decision on 18 March 1999 (as above), CERD commented that the amendments 'wind back the protections of Indigenous title offered [under previous Australian law... raising] concerns about the State party's compliance with articles 2 and 5 of the Convention'. Specifically, CERD questioned Australia's compliance with article 5(c) because of the lack of participation of Indigenous communities and lack of communication with these communities. The following is a summary of Article 2 and 5: Article 2 State parties condemn racial discrimination and take steps to pursue all appropriate means towards its elimination, this includes the implementation of policies to eliminate racial discrimination and promote understanding among all races. Additionally, states shall take measures to ensure the adequate development and protection of certain racial groups or individuals belonging to them, for the purpose of guaranteeing full and equal enjoyment of human rights and freedoms. Article 5 State parties shall prohibit and eliminate racial discrimination in all forms, and guarantee all fundamental rights regardless of race, colour, national, or ethnic origin. Some relevant rights in Article 5 include:
(Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner, HEROC. Report No. 1/2000) | ||
Outcomes: | ||
In June 2000, an Australian parliamentary committee considered CERD's decision and found the amendments were consistent with Australia's obligations under ICERD. Based on this parliamentary committee finding, Australia rejected the decision and the amendments were implemented without negotiation with Indigenous people, both at a Federal and State level (Australian Government 1999). |
| ||||
| ||||
|
Was this useful? Click here to fill in the ATNS survey