Print this page | ||
Farrer on behalf of the Ngarrawanji Native Title Claim Group v State of Western Australia [2019] FCA 655 | ||
Binomial Name: | Federal Court of Australia | |
Date: | 21 May 2019 | |
Sub Category: | Consent Determination (Native Title Act) | |
Place: | East Kimberley Region | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
State/Country: | Western Australia, Australia | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
The determination area covers approx 4,065.8319 sq km, covering Moola Bulla Pastoral Lease, including Ngarrawanji (also known as Mount Barrett). For a detailed description of the area and maps see Schedule 1, Attachment B and Attachment C, attached below under documents. The area is within the jurisdiction of the Halls Creek Shire Council. | ||
Legal Status: | Registered on the Native Title Register on 28 April 2022 | |
Legal Reference: | Federal Court file no.: WAD41/2019; National Native Title Tribunal file no.: WCD2019/004 and WC1996/075 | |
Alternative Names: | ||
Subject Matter: | Native Title | |
URL: | http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FCA/2019/655.html?context=1;query=[2019]%20FCA%20655%20;mask_path=au/cases/cth/FCA | |
Summary Information: | ||
Between Josephine Farrer, Matt Dawson, Phyllis Wallaby, Marty Stevens, Mark Bin Bakar and Gregory Donald Tait (Applicants) and State of Western Australia (First Respondent) Telstra Corporation Limited (Second Respondent) and Shire of Halls Creek (Third Respondent) Judge: Mortimer J Determination Native title exists in parts of the determination area It consists of exclusive and non-exclusive native title rights and interests. Native title holders The native title holders are people related (including by adoption) to one of the apical ancestors who held rights and interests in one of the local estate countries or are connected to ngarrawanji apical ancestors through spirit connections/and or birth sites or are recognised by the native titled holders as holding rights and responsibilities to the area. Exclusive native title rights and interests over part of the determination area This is the right to possession, occupation, use, and enjoyment of the area described in Schedule 3, to the exclusion of all others. Non-exclusive native title rights and interests over part of the determination area These rights and interests exist over the area described in Schedule 4 and include: The right to have access to, remain in and use that part, which includes but is not
The right to access and take for any purpose the resources on that part, which
The right to protect places, areas and sites of traditional significance on that part,
The right to be accompanied onto the Determination Area by any persons who, the native title holders may invite pursuant to traditional law and custom, being:
Other rights and interests in the determination area include: There are no native title rights and
except the right to take and use ochre to the extent that ochre is not a mineral pursuant to See Schedule 5 and Schedule 8 for further information about the non-native title rights and interests. In the case of conflict, the exercise of non-native title rights and interests will prevail over the non-exclusive native title Within 12 months of the order the common law native title holders are required to indicate whether their native title rights are to be held in a trust and by which body corporate. Full text of the determination is available via the URL link above. | ||
Detailed Information: | ||
Background This claim was first filed on 25 June 1996 pursuant to s 61 The In the Part B determination, Justice Mortimer noted "it is notorious that the treatment of Aboriginal people at Moola Bulla station is a shameful aspect of post sovereignty history in the East Kimberley" [1]. This treatment was discussed in a landline special where a survivor Charlie Yeeda asserted having " seen white people tie them in a tree, flog them with a greenhide rope. Real cruelty, you know, very cruel" (Lee, 2012). At the celebrations for the outcome of the claim, Greg Tait, an applicant for the claim, said "today we walk away with a clear mind and a clear heart. We got here and we should all be very proud of that. All the old people and the spirits will be very proud to see us and our kids today" (Kimberley Land Council, 2019). This was the first of three claims heard over a three day period, which determined that native existed over 93.5% of the Kimberley. This is an area bigger than the size of Belgium (Kimberley Land Council, 2019). Kimberley land council's chief executive officer, Nolan Hunter, praised the determinations, however, raised issues with the process in that it re-traumatises people as people need to discuss how they were forcibly removed from the area or lived under the cruel conditions at the station (Kimberley Land Council,2019). He questioned whether there was a less traumatic and divisive way as the current "native title process forces people to disclose deeply personal and sensitive information to prove their connection to country" (Kimberley Land Council, 2019). Details of Judgment In May 2019, the Ngarrawanji claim group and the State were able to inform the Court of their agreed terms for a Justice Mortimer noted that it had taken more than 20 years for this application to be resolved with a tragic consequence that many elders of the the Ngarrawanji claim group, who were important to establishing the claim and securing an agreement, had not lived to see the determination [2]. Justice Mortimer highlighted "the tolerance and persistence of the Ngarrawanji claim group members in this respect comes on top of, or in addition to, the many other obstacles which have faced Aboriginal people and their communities since non-Indigenous people came to this land" [49]. Justice Mortimer discussed the importance of this land to the Aboriginal people, especially Ngarrawanji (Mount Barrett) and its connection to Eagle Hawk dreaming [1], [30]. Justice Mortimer was satisfied that the authorisation process was pursuant to s 66B of the NTA [15]. | ||
Outcomes: | ||
Native Title exists in part of the determination area |
| ||||
| ||||
|
Was this useful? Click here to fill in the ATNS survey