Print this page | ||
Karlka Nyiyaparli Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC v State of Western Australia [2021] FCA 9 | ||
Binomial Name: | Federal Court of Australia | |
Date: | 26/09/2018 and 19/01/2021 | |
Sub Category: | Consent Determination (Native Title Act) | |
Place: | Central Desert, Pilbara Region | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
State/Country: | Western Australia, Australia | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
Eastern Hamersley Range and extending eastward toward the Rudall River Nation Park. For a detailed description of the area and maps see Schedules 1 and 2 of the determination, attached below under documents. The area is within the jurisdiction of the Shires of Ashburton, East Pilbara, Meekatharra, and Wiluna. | ||
Legal Status: | Registered on the Native Title Register 26/09/2018. | |
Legal Reference: | FCA file nos.: WAD6289/1998, WAD 196/2013, WAD90/2020; NNTT file no.: WCD2018/008. | |
Alternative Names: | ||
Subject Matter: | Native Title | |
URL: | http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FCA/2021/9.html?context=1;query=karlka;mask_path=au/cases/cth/FCA | |
Summary Information: | ||
Between: Karlka Nyiyaparli Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC (Applicant) and State of Western Australia (Respondents) Judge: Colvin J Determination This determination varies Justice Barker's orders in Stock on behalf of the Nyiyaparli People v State of Western Australia (No 5) [2018] FCA 1453 to account for the High Court's finding in Tjungarray v Western Australia [2019] HCA 12 that exploration or prospecting licences or permits covering an area do not prevent the disregarding of the extinguishment of native title under s 47B(2) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (NTA). Native title exists in parts of the determination area It consists of exclusive and non-exclusive native title rights and interests. Native title holders The Nyiyaparli People as described in Schedule 7. Exclusive native title rights and interests exist over part of the determination area Except in relation to flowing and underground water, this is the right to possession, occupation, use, and enjoyment of the area, described in Schedule 3, to the exclusion of all others. The Nyiyaprli People have the right to use and enjoy the flowing and underground water including taking and using the traditional resources of the waters. Non-exclusive native title rights and interests exist over part of the determination area These rights and interests exist over those parts of the Determination Area that are not exclusive areas. This non-exclusive area is shaded yellow on the maps at Schedule Two. The non-exclusive rights include:
Other rights and interests in the determination area include those which occur in relation to:
In the case of conflict, the exercise of non-native title rights and interests will prevail over the native title rights and interests See Schedule Six for further information about the non-native title rights and interests. The Karlka Nyiyaparli Aboriginal Corporation Registered Native Title Body Corporate (RNTBC) is the prescribed body corporate. It performs the functions required under the NTA and holds the native title in trust for the Nyiyiparli People. Full text of the determination is available via the URL link above. | ||
Detailed Information: | ||
Background On 26 September 2018 the Court determined by consent that the Nyiyaparli People held native title over almost 50,000 sq km in Stock on behalf of the Nyiyaparli People v State of Western Australia (No 5) [2018] FCA 1453 (Stock). During that process, the parties had agreed that if the High Court overturned the decision in BHP Billiton Nickel West Pty Ltd v KN (Deceased) (TJIWARL and TJIWARL#2) [2018] FCAFC 8 (BHP Billiton Nickel West Pty Lt), then the Karlka Nyiyaparli Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC may apply for a variation to Stock in relation to areas covered by s 47B(2) of the NTA. Details of Judgment Justice Colvin held that the requirements of s 87 or s 87A of the NTA must be met in an application for a variation [12]. However, in Stock, the Court had determined native title with regard to s 87, and with the implication that but for BHP Billiton Nickel West Pty Ltd, since overturned, it would have been appropriate to make the determination in the terms sought here [13]. Therefore, Colvin J did not consider it necessary to be provided with the material ordinarily required under s 87 to support this determination being made by consent [14]. The parties had filed joint submissions to confirm their view that the orders as proposed were appropriate, and the notice period in relation to the application had expired so ultimately Colvin J was satisfied to recognise the Nyiyaparli People's antie title as proposed [16] -[18]. | ||
Outcomes: | ||
Native title exists in parts of the determination area |
| ||||
| ||||
|
Was this useful? Click here to fill in the ATNS survey