Print this page | ||
Helicopter Tjungarrayi on Behalf of Ngurra Kayanta People v State of Western Australia (No 3) [2017] FCA 938 | ||
Category: | Case Law | |
Binomial Name: | Federal Court of Australia | |
Date: | 15 August 2017 | |
Sub Category: | Litigated Determination | |
Place: | Central Desert Region, Pilbara | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
State/Country: | Western Australia , Australia | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
The area is located in the Central Desert of the Pilbara Region, in the centre of the Great Sandy Desert. For a detailed description of the area and maps see Schedule Two of the determination, attached below under documents. The area is within the jurisdiction of the Shire of East Pilbara and Shire of Halls Creek. | ||
Legal Status: | Registered with the National Native Title Tribunal on the Native Title Register. | |
Legal Reference: | Federal Court file no.: WAD410/2012, WAD326/2015; National Native Title Tribunal file no.: WCD2017/004 | |
Alternative Names: | ||
Subject Matter: | Native Title | |
URL: | https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2017/2017fca0938 | |
Summary Information: | ||
Between: (WAD 410 of 2012): Helicopter Tjungarrayi, Richard Yugumbarri, Frances Nanguri, Rita Minga, Eugene Laurel, Darren Farmer, Sandra Brooking, Jane Bieundurry, Bartholomew Baadjo (Applicant) State of Western Australia, Shire of Halls Creek and Central Desert Native Title Services Ltd (Respondents) Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia (Intervener) (WAD 410 of 2012): Joshua West and Joshua Booth (Applicant) State of Western Australia, Shire of Halls Creek and Central Desert Native Title Services Ltd (Respondents) Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia (Intervener) Judge: Barker J Determination Native title exists in the entire determination area It consists of exclusive and non-exclusive native title rights and interests. Native title holders Those persons who hold native title rights and interests in all or part of the determination area according to traditional law and custom through:
This includes Mukti Taylor, Wakka Taylor, and those people who are recognised under the relevant traditional laws and customs by the other native title holders as having rights in the determination area and who are the descendants of:
Exclusive native title rights and interests exist over all of the determination area This is the right to possession, occupation, use, and enjoyment of the area, described in Schedule One, to the exclusion of all others, subject to 'other rights and interests' as listed below. Other rights and interests in the determination area include:
See Schedule Four for further information about the non-native title rights and interests. In the case of conflict, the exercise of non-native title rights and interests will prevail over the non-exclusive native title The Ngurra Kayanta Aboriginal Corporation Registered Native Title Body Corporate (RNTBC) is the prescribed body corporate. It performs the functions required under the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) and holds the native title in trust] for the native title holders. Full text of the determination is available via the URL link above. | ||
Detailed Information: | ||
Background On 21 December 2012, the applicants filed for native title recognition. On 10 December 2015, the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia intervened regarding the application of s 47B of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (NTA) to parts of the determination area covered by petroleum exploration permits granted under the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Act 1967 (WA) (PGERA). On 10 August 2016, before Helicopter Tjungarrayi on behalf of Ngurra Kayanta People v State of Western Australia [2016] FCA 910 (Ngurra Kayanta) was determined, the original Ngurra Kayanta application was split into two parts (Parts A and B). The parties agreed that no determination should be made in relation to the Part B area until the effect of the petroleum exploration permits was resolved. Barker J addressed that question in Helicopter Tjungarrayi on Behalf of Ngurra Kayanta People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2017] FCA 587 (Ngurra Kayanta #2), holding that the permits did not effect the application of s 47B of the NTA. The applicant subsequently filed a 'Minute of Proposed Orders and Determination of Native Title', noting that all matters in controversy between the parties have been resolved and the Court could now proceed to determine the native title claim in accordance with the NTA [19]. Details of Judgment Having regard to the earlier Ngurra Kayanta determination over the Part A area, and to Ngurra Kayanta #2 which decided that the petroleum exploration permits were not leases within the meaning of the NTA, Baker J was satisfied that this determination of native title should be made. | ||
Outcomes: | ||
Native title exists in the entire determination area. |
| ||||
| ||||
|
Was this useful? Click here to fill in the ATNS survey