Print this page | ||
Nicholls on behalf of the Bundjalung People of Byron Bay and Attorney General of New South Wales [2019] FCA 527 | ||
Binomial Name: | Federal Court of Australia | |
Date: | 30 April 2019 | |
Sub Category: | Consent Determination (Native Title Act) | |
Place: | Northern Rivers | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
State/Country: | New South Wales, Australia | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
The determination area is located on the North Coast of NSW. It extends south from the Brunswick River and Mullumbimby to to Cape Byron and on to Broken Head, and inland to Koonyum Range in the northwest and Bungalow in the south. For a detailed description of the area and maps see Schedule 1 of the determination, attached below under documents. The area is within the jurisdiction of the Byron Shire Council. | ||
Legal Status: | Registered with the National Native Title Tribunal on the Native Title Register. | |
Legal Reference: | Federal Court file no.: NSD6020/2001; National Native Title Tribunal file no.: NCD2019/001 | |
Subject Matter: | Native Title | |
URL: | http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FCA/2019/527.html?context=1;query=Nicholls%20on%20behalf%20of%20the%20Bundjalung%20People%20of%20Byron%20Bay%20and%20Attorney%20General%20of%20New%20South%20Wales;mask_path= | |
Summary Information: | ||
Between: Dulcie Nicholls, Norman Graham, Stanley Kay, Judith Davies, Brian Kelly and Yvonne Stewart on behalf of the Bundjalung People of Byron Bay (Applicant) and Attorney General of NSW, Commonwealth of Australia and Byron Shire Council (Respondents) Judge: Robertson J Determination Native title exists in parts of the determination area It consists of non-exclusive native title rights and interests. Native title holders Native title is held by the Bundjalung People of Byron who:
Non-exclusive native title rights and interests exist over part of the determination area These rights exist over the area described in Schedule 1 and include rights to:
Other rights and interests in the determination area include:
See Schedule 5 for further information about the non-native title rights and interests. In the case of conflict, the exercise of non-native title rights and interests will prevail over the non-exclusive native title The Bundjalung People of Byron Bay Aboriginal Corporation (Arakwal) Aboriginal Corporation Registered Native Title Body Corporate (RNTBC) is the prescribed body corporate. It performs the functions required under the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) and holds the native title in trust Bundjalung People of Byron Bay. Full text of the determination is available via the URL link above. | ||
Detailed Information: | ||
Background This application has had a lengthy history, being first filed in the Federal Court in December 2001, and amended in 2003, 2010, 2011 and 2019 [10]. However, the Arakwal Aboriginal Corporation was registered as early as 1994 to hold any benefits that would be recognised under the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (the NTA), with lengthy negotiations first initiated by Arakwal elders Linder Vidler, Dulcie Nicholls, Lorna Kelly and Yvonne Graham in 1993. Following almost 30 years of negotiations and 20 years of legal proceedings, this claim is only the second time in NSW that native title sea rights have been recognised, and is the first positive determination in an area of NSW with a dense population. Details of Judgment The parties reached agreement as to the terms of a determination of native title agreeing that native title exists in relation to part of the determination area whilst it had been extinguished in relation to the rest. Justice Robertson noted that his power to make orders by consent for a determination occurred pursuant to ss 87 and s 94A of the NTA. In assessing the application, Justice Robertson emphasised that despite the parties agreement it was still necessary to show that there was a recognisable group or society that presently recognised and observes traditional laws and customs in the determination area [18]. The parties argued that the NTA did not require the Court to engage in its own enquiries to determine whether such issues were established by evidence, but only whether there the agreement between the parties had been freely entered into on an informed basis. [20]. However, noting principles and case law in King on behalf of the Eringa Native Title Claim Group v South Australia [2011] FCA 1386; 285 ALR 454, Justice Robertson emphasised the following points regarding the Courts' own inquiries: [22]
Considering the Applicant's evidence, including lay witness affidavits and expert anthropological reports, the Court found the agreement had been freely entered into on an informed basis, satisfied the requirements in s225 of the NTA, and so granted the orders agreed by the parties. | ||
Outcomes: | ||
Native Title exists in parts of the determination area. |
| ||||
| ||||
|
Was this useful? Click here to fill in the ATNS survey