Print this page | ||
Stream v State of Western Australia (Palyku #2) [2021] FCA 1068 | ||
Binomial Name: | Federal Court of Australia | |
Date: | 6 September 2021 | |
Sub Category: | Consent Determination (Native Title Act) | |
Place: | Pilbara Region, west of Nullagine | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
State/Country: | Western Australia , Australia | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
The determination area includes parts of the Hillside, Panorama, Corunna Downs, and Bonney Downs pastoral lease areas and Reserve 10979, as well unclaimed Crown land. See Schedules 1 and 2, attached below, for a description and map of the area. The determination area excludes the areas covered by the Palyku Part A, the Palyku and Palyku #2, and the Nyamal #1 native title determinations. | ||
Legal Status: | Registered on the National Native Title Register | |
Legal Reference: | FCA file no.: WAD483/2018; NNTT file no.: WCD2021/2006 | |
Alternative Names: | ||
Subject Matter: | Native Title | |
URL: | http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FCA/2021/1068.html?context=1;query=stream;mask_path=au/cases/cth/FCA | |
Summary Information: | ||
Between: Kevin Stream, Tammy O'Connor, Peter Jaffrey, Cheryl Mackay and Walter Stream on behalf of the Palyku People (Applicant) and State of Western Australia, Commonwealth of Australia, FMF Pilbara Pty Ltd and Nullagine Gold Pty Ltd (Respondents) Judge: Mckerracher J. Determination Native title exists in parts of the determination area It consists of non-exclusive native title rights and interests. The native title does not exist in the road (shaded pink on the Schedule Two map, attached below), nor in any public works as defined by the NTA and the Titles (Validation) and Native Title (Effects of Past Acts) Act 1995 (WA). Native title holders The native title is held by the Palyku People. Non-exclusive native title rights and interests exist over all of the determination area These rights and interests exist over the area described in Attachment A of the court determination and include rights to:
There are no native title rights and interests in:
These rights and interests are subject to and exercisable in accordance with the laws of the State, Commonwealth, and common law. Other (non-native title) rights and interests in the determination area These other rights and interests exist over the area described in Schedule 4 and include those held under:
In the case of conflict, the exercise of non-native title rights and interests will prevail over the native title rights and interests. See Schedule 4 for further information about the non-native title rights and interests. The Palyku-Jartai Aboriginal Corporation Registered Native Title Body Corporate (RNTBC) is the prescribed body corporate. It performs the functions required under the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) and holds the native title in trust for the Palyku Peoples. Full text of the determination is available via the URL link above. | ||
Detailed Information: | ||
Background On 29 October 2018, the applicant filed a native title claim under s 61 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (NTA) [6]. The Palyku #2 determination area is adjacent to that of the Palyku #1 determination (O'Connor v Western Australia [2019] FCA 330), and when filed, the majority of the Palyku #2 area overlapped with the Nyamal #1 application (determined on 24 September 2019 in Allen on behalf of the Nyamal #1 v State of Western Australia [2019] FCA 1570) and the Nyamal Additional Areas Application [9]-[10]. On 10 March 2021, the un-overlapped areas were subject to a further determination under s 87A of the NTA, that is O'Connor v Western Australia (No 2) [2021] FCA 195 (Palyku #2 (Part A) [11]. Then, on 28 April 2021, the Court dismissed the Nyamal Additional Areas Application, causing a further portion of Palyku #2 to no longer be subject to an overlapping claim area. This area is the subject of this determination [12]. Details of Judgment The native title claimants here are identical to the native title holders in Palyku #1 (Part A) and Palyku #2 (Part A) [17]. The parties agreed to the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests and submitted a Minute of proposed orders to the Court [48]. Justice Mckerracher concluded it was appropriate to make this determination of native title with the consent of the parties under s 87A, and accordingly made orders under s 94A [50]. | ||
Outcomes: | ||
Native title exists in parts of the determination area |
| ||||
| ||||
|
Was this useful? Click here to fill in the ATNS survey