Print this page | ||
Dodd on behalf of the Gudjala People Core Country Claim #1 v State of Queensland [2016] FCA 1505 | ||
Binomial Name: | Federal Court of Australia | |
Date: | 13 December 2016 | |
Sub Category: | Consent Determination (Native Title Act) | |
Place: | Northern Region | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
State/Country: | Queensland, Australia | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
The determination area covers a total of approx. 144.5 sq kms, comprising rural and urban areas in and around Charters Towers. For a detailed description see Schedule 1A of the determination (Schedule 1. B (Map) is attached below). The area is within the jurisdiction of the Charters Towers Regional Council. | ||
Legal Status: | Registered on the National Native Title Register | |
Legal Reference: | FCA file no.: QUD80/2005; NNTT file no.: QCD2016/013 | |
Alternative Names: | ||
Subject Matter: | Native Title | |
URL: | http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FCA/2016/1505.html?context=1;query=Dodd%20on%20behalf%20of%20the%20Gudjala%20People%20Core%20%20;mask_path=au/cases/cth/FCA | |
Summary Information: | ||
Between: Elizabeth Dodd, Andrew (Smoky) Anderson, Christine Hero, Priscilla Michelle Huen and Gloria Santo on behalf of the Gudjala People Core Country Claim #1 (Applicant) and State of Queensland, Charters Towers Regional Council, Flinders Shire Council, and others (Respondents) Judge: Reeves J Determination The Court made orders under s 87A of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (the NTA) for a determination that native title exists in the terms jointly proposed by the parties. The determination area relates to a part (the remainder) of the area covered by Dodd on behalf of the Gudjala People Core Country Claim #1 v State of Queensland (No 3) [2014] FCA 231 (Gudjala People Part A). Each party bore its own costs. Native title exists in the entire determination area It consists of non-exclusive native title rights and interests. Native title holders Native title is held by the Gudjala People. Non-exclusive native title exists over parts of the determination area These rights and interests exist over the area described in Schedule 1 (Part 1: RURAL AREAS, Part 2: URBAN AREAS (ABORIGINAL LAND AREAS), and Part 3: URBAN AREAS) and include the right to:
Other (non-native title) rights and interests in the determination area include those held by:
For further information about the non-native title rights and interests, see Schedule 4 of the court determination (via the url link above). Schedule 5 of the determination (via the url link above) states that the native title will not be exercised in relation to certain areas within four pastoral leases (buildings, airstrips, constructed water storage facilities, stockyards and trap yards. * In the case of conflict, the exercise of the non-native title rights and interests will prevail over the native title rights and interests. * Prescribed body corporate The native title is not held in trust. The Ngrragoonda Aboriginal Corporation performs the functions required under the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) on behalf of the Gudjala People. Full text of the determination is available via the URL link above. | ||
Detailed Information: | ||
Background On 18 March 2014, the Federal Court made a determination by consent that native title exists over part of the areas covered by the application area (Gudjala People Part A). Parts of that application area were affected by military orders and so held over for determination until the High Court had settled the question of extinguishment affecting military orders areas in State of Queensland v Congoo [2015] HCA 17. Those military orders areas are covered by the application in the present case. The parties have an interest in the land and waters of the area and have applied to the Court for a determination of native title in accordance with their consent. Details of Judgment Since the Gudjala Part A and Part B areas are geographically close, Justice Reeves held that the evidentiary materials considered in Gudjala Part A were generally applicable here [16]. His Honour was satisfied that the parties' s 87 agreement had been entered into on a free and informed basis [16]. Being satisfied that all the conditions in s 87A of the NTA had been met, Reeves J found it appropriate to make a determination of native title consistent with the parties' proposed orders without holding a hearing [22]. | ||
Outcomes: | ||
Native title exists in parts of the determination area. |
| ||||
| ||||
|
Was this useful? Click here to fill in the ATNS survey