Print this page | ||
Dodd on behalf of the Gudjala People Core Country Claim #1 v State of Queensland [2016] FCA 1506 | ||
Date: | 13 December 2016 | |
Sub Category: | Consent Determination (Native Title Act) | |
Place: | Northern Region | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
State/Country: | Queensland, Australia | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
The determination area covers part of 5 lots of land located in the township of Charters Towers. For a detailed description of the area see Schedule 1 of the determination (Schedule 1. B (Map) is attached below). The area is within the jurisdiction of the Charters Towers Regional Council. | ||
Legal Status: | Registered on the National Native Title Register | |
Legal Reference: | FCA file no.: QUD147/2006; NNTT file no.: QCD2016/014 | |
Subject Matter: | Native Title | |
URL: | http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FCA/2016/1506.html?context=1;query=Dodd;mask_path=au/cases/cth/FCA | |
Summary Information: | ||
Between: Elizabeth Dodd, Andrew (Smoky) Anderson, Christine Hero, Priscilla Michelle Huen and Gloria Santo on behalf of the Gudjala People Core Country Claim #2 (Applicant) and State of Queensland, Charters Towers Regional Council, Flinders Shire Council (Respondents) Judge: Reeves J Determination The Court made orders under s 87A of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (the NTA) for a determination by consent that non-exclusive native title exists over parts of the determination area. The determination area relates to a part of the remainder of the area covered by Dodd on behalf of the Gudjala People Core Country Claim #1 v State of Queensland (No 3) [2014] FCA 231 (Gudjala People Part A). The Applicant was allowed to discontinue any remaining area of the original application that is not included in this determination. Each party bore its own costs. Native title exists in the entire determination area It consists of non-exclusive native title rights and interests. Native title holders Native title is held by the Gudjala People. The non-exclusive native title exists over parts of the determination area These rights and interests exist over the area described in Schedule 1 and include the right to:
Other (non-native title) rights and interests in the Area include those held by:
For further information about the non-native title rights and interests, see Schedule 4 of the court determination (via the url link above). * In the case of conflict, the exercise of the non-native title rights and interests will prevail over the native title rights and interests. * Prescribed body corporate The native title is not held in trust. The Ngrragoonda Aboriginal Corporation performs the functions required under the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) on behalf of the Gudjala People. Full text of the determination is available via the URL link above. | ||
Detailed Information: | ||
Background On 18 March 2014, the Federal Court made a determination by consent that native title exists over part of the areas covered by the application area (Gudjala People Part A). Parts of that application area were affected by military orders and so held over for determination until the High Court had settled the question of extinguishment affecting military orders areas in State of Queensland v Congoo [2015] HCA 17. Those military orders areas are covered by the application in the present case. The parties have an interest in the land and waters of the area and have applied to the Court for a determination of native title in accordance with their consent. Details of Judgment Since the Gudjala Part A and Part B areas are geographically close, Justice Reeves held that the evidentiary materials considered in Gudjala Part A were generally applicable here [16]. His Honour was satisfied that the parties' s 87 agreement had been entered into on a free and informed basis [16]. Being satisfied that all the conditions in s 87A of the NTA had been met, Reeves J found it appropriate to make a determination of native title consistent with the parties' proposed orders without holding a hearing [22]. | ||
Outcomes: | ||
Native title exists in the entire determination area |
| ||||
| ||||
|
Was this useful? Click here to fill in the ATNS survey