Print this page | ||
Stuart v State of South Australia (Oodnadatta Common Overlap Proceeding) (No 2) [2021] FCA 1620 | ||
Category: | Case Law | |
Binomial Name: | Federal Court of Australia | |
Date: | 23 December 2021 | |
Sub Category: | Litigated Determination | |
Place: | The Simpson Desert | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
State/Country: | South Australia, Australia | |
Click this link to search this location with google maps | ||
The determination area covers the town of Oodnadata in far north South Australia, and surrounding areas including the stock reserve known as the Oodnadatta Common. Oodnadatta is located about 160 km south of the Northern Territory border and over 100 km west-north-west of Lake Eyre. The area is described in Schedule 1 and shown in the map in Schedule 2. The determination area is located in the Pastoral Unincorporated Area. | ||
Legal Reference: | Federal Court No: SAD78/2013, SAD220/2018; National Native Title Tribunal No: SCD2021/003 | |
Alternative Names: | ||
Subject Matter: | Native Title | |
URL: | http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FCA/2021/1620.html?context=1;query=oodnadatta;mask_path= | |
Summary Information: | ||
Between: Aaron Stuart and others named in the Schedule (Arabana No 2 Native Title Claim (Part 2) (SAD38/2013) (First Applicant), Dean Ah Chee and others named in the Schedule (Walka Wani Oodnadatta Native Title Claim) (SAD78/2013) (Second Applicant) and Audrey Stewart and others named in the Schedule (Walka Wani Oodnadatta #2 Native Title Claim) (SAD220/2018) (Third Applicant) and the State of South Australia and others named in the Schedule (Respondents) Judge: White J Determination: Native title exists in parts of the determination area Native title holders The native title holders are:
For more information on the Lower Southern Arrernte and Yankunytjatjara/Luritja Descent Groups, refer to Schedules 4 and 5 in the Extract attached. Non-exclusive native title rights and interests in the determination area include the right to:
Other rights and interests in the determination area include the rights and interests of:
In the case of conflict, the exercise of non-native title rights and interests will prevail over the non-exclusive native title. At the time of writing, no prescribed body corporate has been registered for the area. The native title is not to be held in trust. | ||
Detailed Information: | ||
Background On 1 March 2013, the Arabana People filed a native title application (the Arabana No 2 Application, SAD38/2013) over two separate areas (Part 1 and Part 2 areas). A determination of native title was made by consent over the Part 1 area, near Maree, in Stuart v State of South Australia (No 3) [2021] FCA 230. The Part 2 area concerns Oodnadatta and is subject to consideration in this present determination [2]-[4]. The Walka Wani People, who are comprised of Lower Southern Arrernte and Yankunytjatjara/Luritja People brought two applications, the first on 12 April 2013 (SAD78/2013) and the other on 14 September 2018 [5]. The two Walka Wani applications together overlap exactly the area of the Arabana Part 2 claim [5]. As contested overlapping claims can lead to conflict and tension between claim groups, the Court ordered two mediations by Registrars which were conducted in 2015 and 2018 - neither resulted in a mediated outcome and the parties' positions seemed intractable [10]. Thus, the Court ordered, pursuant to s 67 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (NTA) for the Arabana, and the two Walka Wani applications to be dealt with in one proceeding known as the Oodnadatta Common Overlap Proceeding [11]. Details of the Judgment The State of South Australia argued that neither the Arabana nor the Walka Wani had shown their connection to the Overlap Area for the purpose of establishing native title: the Arabana not having maintained connection, and the Walka Wani not having had connection at the time of effective British sovereignty [59]. White J, in assessing the continuity of the use of natural resources, the practice of customs and traditions, and other evidence that the Arabana People relied upon, was not satisfied that the Arabana People had shown their maintenance of connection with the Overlap Area and their claim was dismissed [907]-[916]. White J found that the Walka Wani did have non-exclusive native title rights and interests by virtue of their acknowledgment and observance of traditional law and custom over the Overlap Area at the time of effective sovereignty, subject to the issue of tenure, and the Walka Wani applications succeeded [985]-[986]. The issue of tenure The Overlap Area comprised 156 allotments. The State and the Walka Wani agreed that native title existed over 25 of the allotments and that native title had been extinguished over 72 [988-994]. Whilst the Walka Wani contended that s 47A of the NTA applied to disregard extinguishment in relation to 58 allotments [995], White J concluded that extinguishment could be disregarded over the 42 allotments described in Part 2 of Schedule 3 (attached). Native title had been wholly extinguished over a total of 93 allotments as described in Schedule 6 (attached). | ||
Outcomes: | ||
Native title exists in parts of the determination area |
Related Entries |
Organisation |
Legislation |
People |
Documents |
Document |
National Native Title Register Extract for SCD2021/003 as at 23/12/2021 (Oodnadatta Common Overlap Proceeding) - ( PDF | PDF | PDF | PDF | PDF) |
| ||||
| ||||
|
Was this useful? Click here to fill in the ATNS survey